Abstract
Over the last several decades, policymakers have focused on rebalancing Medicaid-funded long-term services and supports toward home and community-based services (HCBS). The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) included several opportunities for states to further promote HCBS options. One optional opportunity for states to expand Medicaid HCBS was the 1915(k) Community First Choice (CFC) program. To date, eight states have elected to add CFC as a Medicaid benefit. This study utilized comparative case studies to identify the factors that influenced states’ adoption of CFC. Results highlight the important role that state bureaucrats, economic concerns, and existing HCBS programs had on states’ decisions to adopt CFC.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 177-191 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Home Health Care Services Quarterly |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2021 |
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Health Policy
- Community and Home Care
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Keywords
- Affordable Care Act
- Home and community-based services
- Medicaid
- policy adoption
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A comparative analysis of state adoption of the Community First Choice program'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS