Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Advancing coastal and marine ecological restoration in Australia

  • Melinda A. Coleman
  • , Line K. Bay
  • , Kevin R. Bairos-Novak
  • , Mibu Fischer
  • , Justine Bell-James
  • , Melanie J. Bishop
  • , Ana B. Bugnot
  • , Christopher Doropoulos
  • , Patrick G. Dwyer
  • , Mariana Mayer-Pinto
  • , Rebecca L. Morris
  • , Abbie A. Rogers
  • , Adriana Vergés
  • , Nathan J. Waltham
  • , Georgina Wood
  • , Tanveer M. Adyel
  • , Rodrigo H. Bustamante
  • , Craig Copeland
  • , Katherine A. Dafforn
  • , William Glamore
  • Tim M. Glasby, Cayne Layton, Catherine E. Lovelock, Ezequiel M. Marzinelli, Justin I. McDonald, Elizabeth A. Sinclair, Elisabeth M.A. Strain, Bruce Taylor, Rowan Trebilco, Alice J. Twomey, Eric J. Woehler, Mary A. Young, Megan I. Saunders
  • New South Wales Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development - Fisheries
  • University of Western Australia
  • Australian Institute of Marine Science
  • CSIRO
  • University of Tasmania
  • University of Queensland
  • Macquarie University
  • University of New South Wales
  • University of Melbourne
  • James Cook University Queensland
  • College of Science and Engineering
  • Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology University
  • OzFish Unlimited Limited
  • University of Sydney
  • Western Australia
  • Australian Coastal Society and Australasian Seabird Group
  • Deakin University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Australian coastal and marine ecosystems underpin the nation's social, cultural, and economic values, but are increasingly degraded by climate change and other human pressures. Conventional management has failed to halt biodiversity loss, prompting calls for more active intervention. Australia is advancing knowledge to support restoration and climate adaptation, with some approaches now in pilot stages or nearing implementation. However, greater investment in restoration research and development is needed to accelerate progress. Four priorities emerge. First, large-scale, long-term restoration testbeds are required across ecosystems, supported by transparent governance and sustained funding to evaluate effectiveness and impact in real-world conditions. Second, transformative innovation is needed to enable scaling and improve climate resilience, including novel genetic tools and multidisciplinary approaches. Third, evidence-based decision-support systems must better integrate data to improve prediction, prioritisation, and evaluation of restoration outcomes. Finally, social dimensions are critical: building a skilled workforce, enabling conditions for implementation, and supporting Indigenous leadership and co-design will maximise outcomes across people, planet, profit, and purpose. Investment in these areas will deliver coordinated, effective restoration and maximise ecological, societal, economic, and cultural benefits now and into the future.

Original languageEnglish
JournalAustralian Journal of Maritime and Ocean Affairs
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2026

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Transportation
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Ocean Engineering
  • Safety Research
  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Keywords

  • adaptation
  • climate change
  • estuary
  • habitat-forming species
  • hybrid solutions
  • nature-based approach
  • nature-based solution
  • oceans
  • rehabilitation
  • Resilience

Cite this