An approach to definition of genetic alterations in prostate cancer

Growth patterns in prostatic cancer can reduce detect-ability of genetic alterations. Tumors show histologic grade heterogeneity, multifocality, interdigitation of benign and malignant glands, and varying amounts of stroma. These characteristics introduce sampling errors when one uses traditional methods for genetic analysis that depend on disaggregated cells [metaphase or interphase chromosome studies] or on tissue extracts [Southern blotting or polymerase chain reaction (PCR)] to detect molecular events. To circumvent these problems, we used two approaches to study paraffin–embedded tumors, which permit focused analysis of critical tissue components. Serial 4− to 5–μm sections are applied to slides in groups of three. Every second slide is hematoxylin and eosin stained to visualize areas of carcinoma, dysplasia. hyperplasia, and stroma; tumor-rich areas are circled with ink and used as templates to examine or excise the same areas from adjacent nonstained sections. PCR methods for quantitative and qualitative gene assay are effective in evaluating samples when alteration at a particular locus is suspected. Fluorescence in situ hybridization with chromosome–specific paracentromeric probes for detection of copy number of the relevant chromosome is applied to the adjacent section. Normal chromosome controls for both methods were demonstrated. This protocol enables us to correlate genetic alterations precisely with tumor extent and morphology.