Abstract
I examine Robert Brandom's reading of the classical pragmatists, as given in his new book Perspectives on Pragmatism: Classical, Recent, and Contemporary. I argue that his reading is deficient in certain fundamental respects, and that this deficiency illuminates important blind spots in Brandom's overall theoretical project. Specifically, I focus on Brandom's rationalist pragmatism and its rejection of the classical pragmatic concep- tion of experience. I argue that this rejec- tion is based on an overly instrumental reading of the classical figures, as well as on an incorrect interpretation of them as suc- cumbing to the Myth of the Given. My overall goal is to demonstrate that Brandom is lead astray in his encounter with the clas- sical pragmatists because of his unwilling- ness to integrate into his theoretical picture the essentially embodied nature of human cognitive and practical activity.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 125-140 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Transactions of the Charles S Peirce Society |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2012 |
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Philosophy
Keywords
- Classical pragmatism
- Experience
- Rationalist pragmatism
- Robert brandom
- Semantic instrumentalism
- The myth of the given
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Brandom's pragmatism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS