Abstract
Few systematically assess the determinants of Medicaid nursing facility reimbursement. Consequently, this article examines what factors influenceprogram administrators'decisions regarding nursing facility cost report data - the basic information states use to establish payment. Whereas elected officials focus primarily on how much is spent on nursing homes, state Medicaid officials assume primary responsibility for the esoteric and highly technical dimensions that help make spending goals a reality. Findings indicate that the federal government influenced state policy by enabling provider litigation under the Boren Amendment. They also indicate that program administrators responded rationally to fiscal and economic concerns, and that states with stronger administrative capacity were better able to overcome obstacles to sustaining desired policies. Although results reveal that states with more powerful nursing home lobbies tended to implement more generous systems, they fail to reveal significant associations between cost report year and lobbying activity on behalf of the elderly.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 189-216 |
| Number of pages | 28 |
| Journal | Medical Care Research and Review |
| Volume | 63 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Apr 2006 |
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Health Policy
Keywords
- Intergovernmental
- Litigation
- Medicaid
- Nursing homes
- Policy making
- States
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Bureaucratic policy making on trial: Medicaid nursing facility reimbursement, 1988-1998'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS