Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Contesting Dishonesty: When and Why Perspective-Taking Decreases Ethical Tolerance of Marketplace Deception

  • Towson University
  • University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Deception is common in the marketplace where individuals pursue self-interests from their perspectives. Extant research suggests that perspective-taking, a cognitive process of putting oneself in other’s situation, increases consumers’ ethical tolerance for marketers’ deceptive behaviors. By contrast, the current research demonstrates that consumers (as observers) who take the dishonest marketers’ perspective (vs. not) become less tolerant of deception when consumers’ moral self-awareness is high. This effect is driven by moral self-other differentiation as consumers contemplate deception from the marketers’ perspective: high awareness of the “moral self” motivates consumers to distance themselves from the “immoral other.” The findings shed new light on how self-morality can vicariously shape social consideration in ethical judgments.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)117-133
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Business Ethics
Volume175
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2022

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Business and International Management
  • General Business,Management and Accounting
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Law

Keywords

  • Ethical tolerance
  • Moral self-awareness
  • Perspective-taking

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Contesting Dishonesty: When and Why Perspective-Taking Decreases Ethical Tolerance of Marketplace Deception'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this