Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

CSR Report Readability: Does It Matter to Analyst Recommendations and Information Environment?

  • University of New Hampshire

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study examines whether corporate social responsibility (CSR) report readability affects the ability of analyst recommendations to predict future returns, as well as the analysts' information environment. The results indicate that easy-to-read CSR disclosure improves the return predictability of analyst recommendations. Furthermore, we show that the effect of CSR report readability on analysts' information environment is driven entirely by reducing uncertainty, not by reducing information asymmetry among analysts, and this result is more pronounced for firms with relatively low CSR performance. Additionally, we demonstrate that one possible channel through which more readable CSR reports may enhance the return predictability of analyst recommendations is by aligning these recommendations with valuation estimates from the residual income model.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2650014
JournalReview of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies
Volume29
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2026

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Finance
  • Economics and Econometrics

Keywords

  • analysts' information environment
  • CSR report readability
  • information asymmetry
  • return predictability of analyst recommendations
  • uncertainty

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'CSR Report Readability: Does It Matter to Analyst Recommendations and Information Environment?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this