Abstract
Our long-term performance study on economic profit over the past quarter century reveals that economic value added (EVA) still matters. An EVA-style strategy outperforms the market by providing higher risk-adjusted returns compared to large-cap benchmarks, including the S&P 500 and Russell 1000. Our performance assessment reveals that the positive EVA styles outperform the negative EVA styles in terms of absolute returns and risk-adjusted returns. As such, the positive EVA styles provide relatively attractive returns and may serve as a natural portfolio hedge with below-average systematic risk. Our multifactor regression tests using Fama–French methods reveal that an EVA-style effect remains in asset returns because the alphas are significant across the EVA styles. We note some interesting return differences and a structural break that occurred during the Global Financial Crisis. We also modify the traditional investment strategy recommendations for EVA-style analysis to better reflect the empirical results observed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 133-147 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Journal of Portfolio Management |
| Volume | 51 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Apr 2025 |
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Accounting
- General Business,Management and Accounting
- Finance
- Economics and Econometrics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Does an Economic Profit Strategy Outperform the Market? A Long-Term Study Using EVA-Style Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS