Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Effectiveness of Synchronous Postdischarge Contacts on Health Care Use and Patient Satisfaction A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

  • Joel C. Boggan
  • , Spoorthi Sankineni
  • , Paul A. Dennis
  • , Dazhe Chen
  • , Tina Wong Sledge
  • , David Halpern
  • , Sharron Rushton
  • , John W. Williams
  • , Tatyana Der
  • , Amir Alishahi Tabriz
  • , Adelaide M. Gordon
  • , Morgan Jacobs
  • , Nathan A. Boucher
  • , Maria Colandrea
  • , Anastasia Stefania Alexopoulos
  • , Joanne Roman Jones
  • , Nina Leflore-Lloyd
  • , Sarah Cantrell
  • , Karen M. Goldstein
  • , Jennifer M. Gierisch
  • Duke University
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Moffitt Cancer Center
  • Durham VA Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT) Durham VA Health Care System

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Postdischarge contacts (PDCs) after hospitalization are common practice, but their effectiveness in reducing use of acute care after discharge remains unclear. Purpose: To assess the effects of PDC on 30-day emergency department (ED) visits, 30-day hospital readmissions, and patient satisfaction. Data Sources: MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL searched from 2012 to 25 May 2023. Study Selection: Randomized and nonrandomized trials of PDC within 7 days. Data Extraction: Two investigators independently screened articles and assessed risk of bias (ROB). Single reviewers extracted data, with verification by second investigators. Random-effects meta-analyses were done on outcomes shared by at least 3 studies, and the certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) framework. Data Synthesis: Of 13 included studies (11 randomized trials [RTs]), 12 delivered PDCs via telephone. Three of 11 RTs were rated as having low ROB, with 1 rated high. Most PDC interventions (n = 10) consisted of single telephone contacts, often within 3 days. Eight studies focused on patients identified as higher-risk by the authors. There were no differences in 30-day ED use (5 RTs; 3054 patients; risk difference, 0.00 [95% CI, -0.02 to 0.03]; moderate certainty) or 30-day hospital readmissions (7 RTs; 7075 patients; risk difference, 0.00 [CI, -0.02 to 0.02]; moderate certainty) with PDC. Limitation: Adherence and fidelity to PDC interventions were poorly described, and only 1 study investigated nontelephone PDC. Conclusion: Postdischarge contacts within 7 days of discharge were not associated with reductions in 30-day ED use or readmissions compared with usual care. Health systems should reconsider the utility of universal PDCs because multifaceted interventions targeting higher-risk patients may be necessary to reduce use of acute care after discharge.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)229-240
Number of pages12
JournalAnnals of Internal Medicine
Volume178
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2025

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Internal Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effectiveness of Synchronous Postdischarge Contacts on Health Care Use and Patient Satisfaction A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this