Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Enabling ecological survey data integration with the Humboldt Extension to Darwin Core

  • Yanina V. Sica
  • , Wesley M. Hochachka
  • , Robert D. Stevenson
  • , Kate Ingenloff
  • , Paula F. Zermoglio
  • , John Wieczorek
  • , Yi Ming Gan
  • , Dmitry Schigel
  • , Zachary R. Kachian
  • , Steve Baskauf
  • , Peter Brenton
  • , Anahita J.N. Kazem
  • , Walter Jetz
  • , Robert Guralnick
  • Yale University
  • Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung
  • Cornell University
  • Secretariat
  • Universidad Nacional de Río Negro
  • Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
  • Rauthiflor LLC
  • Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences
  • Field Museum of Natural History
  • Vanderbilt University
  • CSIRO
  • German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig
  • University of Florida

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In the face of the global biodiversity crisis, accessibility to biodiversity data that are maximally effective for downstream use in science, conservation, and policy is paramount. The Darwin Core standard has played a central role in providing a standardised structure and vocabulary for biodiversity data. However, early iterations of the standard were not optimised to capture the sampling context of biodiversity surveys – survey methods, scope, and sampling effort – which is essential for the correct interpretation and potential reuse of such data. To address this limitation, we present the Humboldt Extension to Darwin Core, a ratified standard designed to accommodate datasets that contain such contextual information. Building upon an initial, previously developed framework, we significantly improved, fully tested, and ratified a final standard, following a community process defined by biodiversity information standards (TDWG), an international standards organisation. The resulting Humboldt Extension adds 55 terms that enrich the Darwin Core, providing the terms needed to capture and share multiple types of biodiversity survey data. We illustrate the benefits of implementing the Humboldt Extension with three case studies and demonstrate how richer data can be used in research, modelling, and to inform decision-making. We urge the uptake and use of this Extension to facilitate the reuse and synthesis of monitoring data, particularly structured surveys and inventories, for science, conservation, and policy.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEcography
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2025

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Keywords

  • biodiversity monitoring
  • data standards
  • ecological inventories
  • FAIR data
  • sampling design

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Enabling ecological survey data integration with the Humboldt Extension to Darwin Core'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this