Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Establishing Specificity in Psychotherapy: A Meta-Analysis of Structural Equivalence of Placebo Controls

  • Thomas W. Baskin
  • , Sandy Callen Tierney
  • , Takuya Minami
  • , Bruce E. Wampold
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Placebo treatments in psychotherapy cannot adequately control for all common factors, which thereby attenuates their effects vis-h-vis active treatments. In this study, the authors used meta-analytic procedures to test one possible factor contributing to the attenuation of effects: structural inequalities between placebo and active treatments. Structural aspects of the placebo included number and duration of sessions, training of therapist, format of therapy, and restriction of topics. Results indicate that comparisons between active treatments and structurally inequivalent placebos produced larger effects than comparisons between active treatments and structurally equivalent placebos; moreover, the latter comparison produced negligible effects, indicating that active treatments were not demonstrably superior to well-designed placebos.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)973-979
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Volume71
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2003

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Establishing Specificity in Psychotherapy: A Meta-Analysis of Structural Equivalence of Placebo Controls'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this