Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Ethnographic methods: Training norms and practices and the future of American anthropology

  • Rosalyn Negrón
  • , Amber Wutich
  • , H. Russell Bernard
  • , Alexandra Brewis
  • , Alissa Ruth
  • , Katherine Mayfour
  • , Barbara Piperata
  • , Melissa Beresford
  • , Cindi SturtzSreetharan
  • , Pardis Mahdavi
  • , Jessica Hardin
  • , Rebecca Zarger
  • , Krista Harper
  • , James Holland Jones
  • , Clarence C. Gravlee
  • , Bryan Brayboy
  • Arizona State University
  • Ohio State University
  • San Jose State University
  • University of La Verne
  • Rochester Institute of Technology
  • University of South Florida
  • University of Massachusetts
  • Stanford University
  • University of Florida
  • Northwestern University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

American anthropology is engaged in significant self-reckonings that call for big changes to how anthropology is practiced. These include (1) recognizing and taking seriously the demands to decolonize the ways research is done, (2) addressing precarious employment in academic anthropology, and (3) creating a discipline better positioned to respond to urgent societal needs. A central role for ethnographic methods training is a thread that runs through each of these three reckonings. This article, written by a team of cultural, biocultural, and linguistic anthropologists, outlines key connections between ethnographic methods training and the challenges facing anthropology. We draw on insights from a large-scale survey of American Anthropological Association members to examine current ethnographic methods capabilities and training practices. Study findings are presented and explored to answer three guiding questions: To what extent do our current anthropological practices in ethnographic methods training serve to advance or undermine current calls for disciplinary change? To what extent do instructors themselves identify disconnects between their own practices and the need for innovation? And, finally, what can be done, and at what scale, to leverage ethnographic methods training to meet calls for disciplinary change?.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)458-469
Number of pages12
JournalAmerican Anthropologist
Volume126
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2024

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Anthropology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Keywords

  • American anthropology
  • ethnographic research
  • graduate education
  • methods training

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ethnographic methods: Training norms and practices and the future of American anthropology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this