Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Evaluating knowledge to support climate action: A framework for sustained assessment. Report of an independent advisory committee on applied climate assessment

  • R. H. Moss
  • , S. Avery
  • , K. Baja
  • , M. Burkett
  • , A. M. Chischilly
  • , J. Dell
  • , P. A. Fleming
  • , K. Geil
  • , K. Jacobs
  • , A. Jones
  • , K. Knowlton
  • , J. Koh
  • , M. C. Lemos
  • , J. Melillo
  • , R. Pandya
  • , T. C. Richmond
  • , L. Scarlett
  • , J. Snyder
  • , M. Stults
  • , A. M. Waple
  • J. Whitehead, D. Zarrilli, B. M. Ayyub, J. Fox, A. Ganguly, L. Joppa, S. Julius, P. Kirshen, R. Kreutter, A. McGovern, R. Meyer, J. Neumann, W. Solecki, J. Smith, P. Tissot, G. Yohe, R. Zimmerman
  • Columbia University
  • Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
  • Urban Sustainability Directors Network
  • University of Hawai'i at Mānoa
  • Northern Arizona University
  • Resiliency Resources LLC
  • Microsoft USA
  • United States Department of Agriculture
  • University of Arizona
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  • Lightsmith Group
  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • The University of Chicago
  • American Geophysical Union
  • Van Ness Feldman
  • The Nature Conservancy
  • New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
  • City of Ann Arbor
  • Studio30k
  • North Carolina Sea Grant
  • New York City Mayor’s Office
  • University of Maryland, College Park
  • National Environmental Modeling and Analysis Center
  • Northeastern University
  • United States Environmental Protection Agency
  • Princeton University
  • University of Oklahoma
  • University of California at Davis
  • Industrial Economics
  • City University of New York
  • Abt Associates, Inc.
  • Texas A&M University
  • Wesleyan University
  • New York University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

As states, cities, tribes, and private interests cope with climate damages and seek to increase preparedness and resilience, they will need to navigate myriad choices and options available to them. Making these choices in ways that identify pathways for climate action that support their development objectives will require constructive public dialogue, community participation, and flexible and ongoing access to science- and experience-based knowledge. In 2016, a Federal Advisory Committee (FAC) was convened to recommend how to conduct a sustained National Climate Assessment (NCA) to increase the relevance and usability of assessments for informing action. The FAC was disbanded in 2017, but members and additional experts reconvened to complete the report that is presented here. A key recommendation is establishing a new nonfederal ‘‘climate assessment consortium’’ to increase the role of state/local/tribal government and civil society in assessments. The expanded process would 1) focus on applied problems faced by practitioners, 2) organize sustained partnerships for collaborative learning across similar projects and case studies to identify effective tested practices, and 3) assess and improve knowledge-based methods for project implementation. Specific recommendations include evaluating climate models and data using user-defined metrics; improving benefit–cost assessment and supporting decision-making under uncertainty; and accelerating application of tools and methods such as citizen science, artificial intelligence, indicators, and geospatial analysis. The recommendations are the result of broad consultation and present an ambitious agenda for federal agencies, state/local/tribal jurisdictions, universities and the research sector, professional associations, nongovernmental and community-based organizations, and private-sector firms.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)465-487
Number of pages23
JournalWeather, Climate, and Society
Volume11
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2019

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Atmospheric Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating knowledge to support climate action: A framework for sustained assessment. Report of an independent advisory committee on applied climate assessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this