Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Evidence-based treatments for depression and anxiety versus treatment-as-usual: A meta-analysis of direct comparisons

  • Bruce E. Wampold
  • , Stephanie L. Budge
  • , Kevin M. Laska
  • , A. C. del Re
  • , Timothy P. Baardseth
  • , Christoph Fluckiger
  • , Takuya Minami
  • , D. Martin Kivlighan
  • , Wade Gunn
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • Modum Bad
  • University of Louisville
  • Stanford University
  • University of Bern

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1304-1312
Number of pages9
JournalClinical Psychology Review
Volume31
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2011

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Keywords

  • Anxiety
  • Depression
  • Evidence-based treatments
  • Meta-analysis
  • Treatment-as-usual

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evidence-based treatments for depression and anxiety versus treatment-as-usual: A meta-analysis of direct comparisons'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this