Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Experiments on the design and evaluation of complex survey questions

  • Paul Beatty
  • , Carol Cosenza
  • , Floyd J. Fowler
  • U.S. Census Bureau
  • University of Massachusetts Boston

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter

Abstract

Complex questions may appeal to survey researchers because they maximize the specificity of data while minimizing the number of distinct data items collected. This chapter provides examples of experiments designed to inform particular questionnaire design decisions in which the available guidance was limited or ambiguous. Each of the experiments begin with a dilemma involving draft questions proposed for national surveys, in which there was more than one plausible way to craft the question, and limited guidance regarding which was preferable. Initially, the dilemmas involved the optimal structure of questions that were long and grammatically complex, potentially including detailed descriptions and definitions, examples, explanations, multiple clauses, qualifiers, or including specific response categories. As the survey research progressed, it moved from matters of structural complexity to conceptual complexity - for example, considering the optimal way to manage questions containing disparate concepts, or ambiguity of question intent arising from context.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationExperimental Methods in Survey Research
Subtitle of host publicationTechniques that Combine Random Sampling with Random Assignment
PublisherWiley
Pages113-129
Number of pages17
ISBN (Electronic)9781119083771
ISBN (Print)9781119083740
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 30 2019

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • General Social Sciences

Keywords

  • Complex survey questions
  • Conceptual complexity
  • Dangling qualifiers
  • National surveys
  • Questionnaire design decisions
  • Randomized experiments
  • Response categories

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Experiments on the design and evaluation of complex survey questions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this