Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Forgetting after war: A qualified defense

  • United Way of Massachusetts Bay and Merrimack Valley
  • Suffolk University

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter

Abstract

Philosophical scholarship on transitional justice has largely focused on adjudicating between retributive or restorative justice in post-conflict societies. Some scholars have begun to urge theorists of transitional justice to take into account the economic, cultural, and social realities of post-conflict nations. Transitional justice as structural justice focuses primarily on the political, social, and economic institutions that give rise to violence. Literature in transitional justice spans both theoretical and empirical realms. A great deal of work has been done on the empirical issues of transitional justice by anthropologists, sociologists, historians, and journalists. Each transitional society is different and as such one could argue that the empirical study of particular nations is much more crucial to the process of transition than abstract theory. Theorizing about transitional justice apart from any particular cases of it can draw attention to common problems. Transitional justice as structural justice takes as its starting point an evaluation of the institutions that contributed to the original conflict.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationTheorizing Transitional Justice
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages13-28
Number of pages16
ISBN (Electronic)9781317010876
ISBN (Print)9781472418296
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • General Social Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Forgetting after war: A qualified defense'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this