Abstract
This paper is a critique of forgiveness therapy that focuses on the cultural contexts in which forgiveness therapy arose, with a special focus on the movement to address the victimization of women. I describe forgiveness as described by forgiveness therapy advocates and the moral and non-moral benefits claimed on its behalf. I then describe the cultural context that may explain the popularity of this form of therapy at this historical moment; the first context is a broad cultural context, looking at ideologies and practices that support forgiveness as a therapeutic intervention; the second context is the more narrow context of a movement within the field of psychology called "positive psychology" that also supports forgiveness interventions; and the third context, is the ideologies and narratives around victimization and in particular victimization against women that have led to an application of forgiveness therapy for victims of abuse (Freedman & Enright, 1996). After describing these three contexts in which forgiveness therapy arose, I present a critique from a feminist as well as a broader humanistic/psychodynamic perspective.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 61-80 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2005 |
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Philosophy
- General Psychology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Forgiveness therapy: The context and conflict'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS