Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Governance among confounding logics: The case of depaul industries

  • University of Rhode Island
  • DePaul Industries

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

This paper explores board decision-making in social enterprises. It argues that while dominant theoretical frameworks (agency and stakeholder theories) help to understand the challenges faced by the boards of social enterprises, they need to be complemented to account, more adequately, for challenges deriving from the confounding logics framing valuations of organizational effectiveness in social enterprises. The paper identifies pace of decision-making as a crucial variable that requires further research attention and, building on the literature on group decision and dynamics, it advances several factors that can frame the expediency (or sluggishness) with which the boards of social enterprises take decisions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)27-52
Number of pages26
JournalJournal of Social Entrepreneurship
Volume2
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2011

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Development
  • Economics and Econometrics

Keywords

  • Board of directors
  • Governance
  • Social enterprises

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Governance among confounding logics: The case of depaul industries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this