Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Managed care for medicare-medicaid dual eligibles: Appropriateness, availability, payment, and policy

  • Yale University
  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • Cornell University
  • Florida State University
  • Pepper Inst. on Aging and Pub. Plcy.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

The bifurcation of responsibility for caring for dual eligibles has helped create a fragmented service delivery system, fraught with administrative inefficiencies, barriers to more effective care, and incentives to shift costs. To better serve this population, the federal government and several states have developed a number of pilot initiatives that promote integration by relying on capitated managed care. However, evidence suggests that this approach may be plagued by certain problems, including lack of experience with persons who are chronically ill, incentives to under provide care, favorable selection, limited plan availability, and mixed outcome and satisfaction performance. Although case-managed approaches pursue integration without capitation, they must typically rely on voluntary provider cooperation to be successful, something that is difficult to achieve. Given the recent nature of most integration initiatives, it is recommended that policy makers continue to promote innovation in each of the following areas: care coordination, administration, provider payment, plan participation, and evaluation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)333-348
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Applied Gerontology
Volume23
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2004

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Gerontology
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Keywords

  • Capitation
  • Case management
  • Demonstrations
  • Dual eligibles
  • Elderly
  • Integration
  • Managed care
  • Medicaid
  • Medicare

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Managed care for medicare-medicaid dual eligibles: Appropriateness, availability, payment, and policy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this