Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Negotiating Medical Authority: Shared Decision-Making in the ICU

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Hospitalized individuals who are unable to communicate have the right to an empowered surrogate who participates in shared decision-making. Based on 300 hours of participant observation in an intensive care unit (ICU) and 35 interviews with staff, this article examines shared decision-making as a negotiated social process of aligning frames of understanding. Drawing from Erving Goffman's concepts of frames (1974) and performance teams (1959), this article shows the interactional strategies ICU clinicians as a team used to bring family surrogates' frame of understanding into alignment with their own assessment that the patient was unlikely to survive. Findings show clinicians maintained authority over end-of-life care while also maintaining a process recognized as shared decision-making.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)555-575
Number of pages21
JournalSymbolic Interaction
Volume44
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2021

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • General Nursing
  • Social Psychology
  • Education
  • Communication
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • General Social Sciences

Keywords

  • end-of-life care
  • ethnography
  • frame analysis
  • intensive care
  • medical authority
  • shared decision-making

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Negotiating Medical Authority: Shared Decision-Making in the ICU'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this