Abstract
Hospitalized individuals who are unable to communicate have the right to an empowered surrogate who participates in shared decision-making. Based on 300 hours of participant observation in an intensive care unit (ICU) and 35 interviews with staff, this article examines shared decision-making as a negotiated social process of aligning frames of understanding. Drawing from Erving Goffman's concepts of frames (1974) and performance teams (1959), this article shows the interactional strategies ICU clinicians as a team used to bring family surrogates' frame of understanding into alignment with their own assessment that the patient was unlikely to survive. Findings show clinicians maintained authority over end-of-life care while also maintaining a process recognized as shared decision-making.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 555-575 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Symbolic Interaction |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Aug 2021 |
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- General Nursing
- Social Psychology
- Education
- Communication
- Sociology and Political Science
- General Social Sciences
Keywords
- end-of-life care
- ethnography
- frame analysis
- intensive care
- medical authority
- shared decision-making
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Negotiating Medical Authority: Shared Decision-Making in the ICU'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS