Opposing Responses to Scarcity Emerge from Functionally Unique Sociality Drivers

From biofilms to whale pods, organisms across taxa live in groups, thereby accruing numerous diverse benefits of soci-ality. All social organisms, however, pay the inherent cost of increased resource competition. One expects that when resources be-come scarce, this cost will increase, causing group sizes to decrease. Indeed, this occurs in some species, but there are also species for which group sizes remain stable or even increase under scarcity. What accounts for these opposing responses? We present a conceptual framework, literature review, and theoretical model demon-strating that differing responses to sudden resource shifts can be explained by which sociality benefit exerts the strongest selection pressure on a particular species. We categorize resource-related benefits of sociality into six functionally distinct classes and model their effect on the survival of individuals foraging in groups under different resource conditions. We find that whether, and to what de-gree, the optimal group size (or correlates thereof) increases, de-creases, or remains constant when resource abundance declines depends strongly on the dominant sociality mechanism. Existing data, although limited, support our model predictions. Overall, we show that across a wide diversity of taxa, differences in how group size shifts in response to resource declines can be driven by differences in the primary benefits of sociality.