Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Physiologic effects of distance running training on teenage females

  • Arizona State University
  • Northern Illinois University
  • Tempe High School

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate selected physiological changes that occurred with distance training in teenage females. Two groups of untrained teenage females were matched on VO2max, percent utilization of VO2 @ 9.66 km/hr, peak heart rate, and percent body fat. One group served as control (n = 9) while the other (n = 10) underwent a 20-week training program designed to gradually increase the subjects’ average mileage from 0 to 32.2 km per week. At the end of the 20 weeks, a MANOVA revealed significant mean differences within the trained group and no significant mean differences within the control group. The univariate analysis revealed that significant (p < 0.05) mean differences found within the training group were for VO2max (45.1 vs. 49.3 ml · kg-1 · min-1), percent utilization of VO2 @ 9.66 km/hr (76.5% vs. 67.5%), and economy VO2 @ 9.66 km/hr (34.5 vs. 33.2 ml · kg-1 · min-1). Of the variables which exhibited significant training effects, percent utilization of VO2 max showed the greatest relative change, a 12.2% decrease, with VO2 max showing a 9.3% increase. The posttest results were similar to the research literature for training effects found for males and other age groups.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)215-220
Number of pages6
JournalResearch Quarterly for Exercise and Sport
Volume56
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1985

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Nephrology

Keywords

  • Fractional utilization of vo max
  • O uptake
  • Running economy
  • Teenage females

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Physiologic effects of distance running training on teenage females'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this