Abstract
Research investigating whether female legislators provide more effective substantive representation on women's issues than their male colleagues faces a significant methodological hurdle. Models used to estimate the effect of gender on representation inevitably omit constituency variables that affect the character of legislators' decisions and are also correlated with gender, potentially biasing the estimates of the effect of gender. Employing a quasi-experimental research design as an alternative strategy, the authors remove this hurdle and estimate the influence of gender on representation free from this potential bias. The authors find that gender does affect representation and observe critical mass effects.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 472-486 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Political Research Quarterly |
| Volume | 64 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jun 2011 |
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Sociology and Political Science
Keywords
- Agenda setting
- Congress
- Descriptive representation
- Substantive representation
- Women and politics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Quasi-experimental design, constituency, and advancing women's interests: Reexamining the influence of gender on substantive representation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS