Abstract
In both academic and practitioner literature, the term "impact" is conceptualized broadly. Yet the application of impact is construed much more narrowly, in association with (uni)-directional relationships between variables and methodological frameworks oriented towards a positivist approach. Such a conceptualization is problematic, particularly in the context of initiatives that have a goal of internal, individual transformation. Thus, I suggest reconceptualizing impact to acknowledge human agency and explore change more holistically. I argue for a reclaiming of impact by the post-positivist qualitative research community, given the potential of qualitative methodologies to elucidate dialogic understandings of impact and the intersubjective context through which transformation emerges.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 5 |
| Journal | Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - May 27 2022 |
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- General Social Sciences
Keywords
- dialogue
- impact
- intersubjectivity
- qualitative research
- transformation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Reclaiming Impact in Qualitative Research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS