Abstract
We describe ion distribution and the current-voltage (i-V) response of nanopipettes at different probe-to-substrate distances (Dps) as simulated by finite-element methods. Results suggest electrostatic interactions between a charged substrate and the nanopipette dominate electrophoretic ion transport through the nanopipette when Dps is within 1 order of magnitude of the Debye length (∼10 nm for a 1 mM solution as employed in the simulation). Ion current rectification (ICR) and permselectivity associated with a neutral or charged nanopipette can be reversibly enhanced or reduced dependent on Dps, charge polarity, and charge density (σ) of the substrate. Regulation of nanopipette current is a consequence of the enrichment or depletion of ions within the nanopipette interior, which influences conductivity of the nanopipette. When the external substrate is less negatively charged than the nanopipette, the substrate first reduces, and then enhances the ICR as Dps decreases. Surprisingly, both experimental and simulated data show that a neutral substrate was also able to reduce and reverse the ICR of a slightly negatively charged nanopipette. Simulated results ascribe such effects to the elimination of ion depletion within the nanopipette at positive potentials.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 11272-11282 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | ACS Nano |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue number | 12 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 23 2013 |
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- General Materials Science
- General Engineering
- General Physics and Astronomy
Keywords
- charged interface
- finite-element simulation
- ion current rectification
- nanopipette
- Poisson-Nernst-Planck equations
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Rectification of ion current in nanopipettes by external substrates'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS