Abstract
A review of 77 studies employing self-report measures of antiretroviral adherence published 1/1996 through 8/2004 revealed great variety in adherence assessment item content, format, and response options. Recall periods ranged from 2 to 365 days (mode=7 days). The most common cutoff for optimal adherence was 100% (21/48 studies, or 44%). In 27 of 34 recall periods (79%), self-reported adherence was associated with adherence as assessed with other indirect measures. Data from 57 of 67 recall periods (84%) indicated self-reported adherence was significantly associated with HIV-1 RNA viral load; in 16 of 26 (62%), it was associated with CD4 count. Clearly, the field would benefit from item standardization and a priori definitions and operationalizations of adherence. We conclude that even brief self-report measures of antiretroviral adherence can be robust, and recommend items and strategies for HIV research and clinical management.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 227-245 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | AIDS and Behavior |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - May 2006 |
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Social Psychology
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Infectious Diseases
Keywords
- Antiretroviral
- HIV/AIDS
- Medication adherence
- Self-report
- Viral load
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Self-report measures of antiretroviral therapy adherence: A review with recommendations for HIV research and clinical management'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS