Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Silences in Psychotherapy: An Integrative Meta-Analytic Research Review

  • William James College

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

Abstract

There is research evidence, from both qualitative and quantitative studies, that silences in psychotherapy have established associations with good and poor outcomes that include and extend beyond symptom measures to processes such as insight, symbolization, and disengagement. Research also has demonstrated that therapists attend to clients’ silences, seeking to comprehend the processes therein and intentionally support productive silent processes. This chapter synthesizes this research and examines features of silence processes to provide psychotherapists with the skills to differentiate the functions of both productive and obstructive forms of pausing. It includes a review of 33 quantitative and qualitative studies on silences in individual psychotherapy (from 309 clients and 209 therapists). Our qualitative and integrative meta-analytic evidence indicated that it enhanced their ability to intervene responsively and enhance therapy outcomes when psychotherapists’ responded strategically to the specific functions of silences. We consider research limitations, training implications, and therapeutic practices based on the research evidence.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)320-341
Number of pages22
JournalPsychotherapy
Volume60
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 6 2023

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Keywords

  • pauses
  • psychotherapy
  • psychotherapy outcome
  • qualitative meta-analysis
  • silence

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Silences in Psychotherapy: An Integrative Meta-Analytic Research Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this