Abstract
Phylogenetic methods for the analysis of species data are widely used in evolutionary studies. However, preliminary data transformations and data reduction procedures (such as a size-correction and principal components analysis, PCA) are often performed without first correcting for nonindependence among the observations for species. In the present short comment and attached R and MATLAB code, I provide an overview of statistically correct procedures for phylogenetic size-correction and PCA. I also show that ignoring phylogeny in preliminary transformations can result in significantly elevated variance and type I error in our statistical estimators, even if subsequent analysis of the transformed data is performed using phylogenetic methods. This means that ignoring phylogeny during preliminary data transformations can possibly lead to spurious results in phylogenetic statistical analyses of species data.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 3258-3268 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Evolution |
| Volume | 63 |
| Issue number | 12 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 2009 |
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Genetics
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Keywords
- Data transformation
- Evolutionary regression
- Least squares
- Linear regression
- PCA
- Phylogenetic comparative methods
- Principal components analysis
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Size-correction and principal components for interspecific comparative studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS