Abstract
Objective: This study analyzes what design elements inhibited enrollment in HEALTHpact. Study Setting. HEALTHpact is a high deductible plan with a premium capped at 10 percent of the average Rhode Island wage. Deductibles are reduced if enrollees meet wellness criteria. Study Design. Qualitative case study. Data Collection. Archival documents and 23 interviews. Principal Findings. Inclusion of a subsidy would have led to lower premiums and more generous coverage. Although priced lower than other plans, HEALTHpact still did not offer good value for most firms. Wellness incentives also were too complex. Conclusions. Subsidies for purchase of insurance coverage are critical to national reform of the small group market. Designers also will need to carefully balance program complexity with innovation in encouraging wellness and product appeal.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 285-297 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Health Services Research |
| Volume | 46 |
| Issue number | 1 PART 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Feb 2011 |
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Health Policy
Keywords
- Employer-based insurance
- health reform
- small group market
- state innovation
- wellness
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Small group health insurance reform in Rhode Island: Promises and pitfalls of the HEALTHpact plan'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS