Abstract
Using social comparison theory as an overarching perspective, we review the literature on learning from others' experience. We examine how social referents are chosen, based on (1) different cues- structural, cognitive, affective, social, or external cues; and (2) different motivations-self-assessment, self-enhancement, or self-improvement. We highlight the usefulness of considering these cues for reference group selection, in predicting the likelihood, the type, and the level of learning. We describe several challenges in predicting learning outcomes based on motives alone. Taken together, we call for more understanding of different cues and bases of social comparison, alongside consideration of motivation, to better understand from whom actors can learn and what can be learned from them.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | The Oxford Handbook of Group and Organizational Learning |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press |
| Pages | 337-351 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9780190263362 |
| State | Published - Apr 5 2017 |
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- General Psychology
Keywords
- Attention
- Knowledge transfer
- Learning from failure
- Organizational learning
- Performance feedback
- Sampling biases
- Selfenhancement
- Social comparison
- Social networks
- Vicarious learning
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Social comparison and learning from others'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS