Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

“Stop the Steal” Sentenced: An Analysis of Judge Appointment Effects on the Sentencing of January 6 Defendants

  • Illinois State University
  • University of Connecticut

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study examines whether the political appointment of federal judges influenced the sentencing of individuals charged in connection with the January 6, 2021, Capitol insurrection. Using a novel dataset covering the full population of nearly 1,500 defendants with charges filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, we leverage random case assignment procedures to better understand the sentences that were imposed for each defendant. Our findings indicate that there were no significant partisan differences in terms of the imposition of incarceration or sentence length by these district judges. However, when disaggregating by individual presidents we find that distinct patterns are evident. These findings highlight the nuanced and sometimes unexpected ways appointment effects manifest in politically sensitive cases. They also underscore the significance of district judges amid ongoing legal conflicts involving presidential power.

Original languageEnglish
JournalPolitical Research Quarterly
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2026

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Keywords

  • district courts
  • District of Columbia
  • January 6
  • judicial appointment effects
  • sentencing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '“Stop the Steal” Sentenced: An Analysis of Judge Appointment Effects on the Sentencing of January 6 Defendants'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this