Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The Need to Reconcile Concepts that Characterize Systems Facing Threats

  • United States Army

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Desirable system performance in the face of threats has been characterized by various management concepts. Through semistructured interviews with editors of journals in the fields of emergency response and systems management, a literature review, and professional judgment, we identified nine related and often interchangeably used system performance concepts: adaptability, agility, reliability, resilience, resistance, robustness, safety, security, and sustainability. A better understanding of these concepts will allow system planners to pursue management strategies best suited to their unique system dynamics and specific objectives of good performance. We analyze expert responses and review the linguistic definitions and mathematical framing of these concepts to understand their applications. We find a lack of consensus on their usage between interview subjects, but by using the mathematical framing to enrich the linguistic definitions, we formulate comparative visualizations and propose distinct definitions for the nine concepts. We present a conceptual framing to relate the concepts for management purposes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3-15
Number of pages13
JournalRisk Analysis
Volume41
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2021

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Physiology (medical)

Keywords

  • resilience
  • risk analysis
  • systems

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Need to Reconcile Concepts that Characterize Systems Facing Threats'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this