TY - CHAP
T1 - The "new discourse city" of older writers
T2 - Aging and disability as assets to collaborative learning
AU - Rumsey, Suzanne Kesler
AU - Ray, Ruth E.
AU - Bowen, Lauren Marshall
AU - Hillard, Donora
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2012 by Koninklijke Brill NV.
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - The purpose of this chapter is to describe new forms of collaboration that occur between undergraduate and graduate-level student writers and community partners who are senior citizens, some of them disabled and dying. We provide three case studies of writers working in a senior learning center, hospice, and a home care setting, examining the productive conflicts that arise in these community sites. By engaging in cross-generational life story projects, student and community participants come to see abstract concepts like rhetorical context and purpose in terms of specific strategies for interacting with diverse others. They learn that writing is inherently a generative, collaborative, and multivocal process, and that we are always accountable to others in creating texts. They find pleasure and meaning in working together, despite and sometimes because of their conflicts. We suggest that composition scholars and teachers re-think their meanings of "community" and "collaboration" and re-consider writing as an act of collaborative risk-taking, experimentation, and imagination. Teaching and learning across the divides of age and ability remind us that writing is, above all, a living social act.
AB - The purpose of this chapter is to describe new forms of collaboration that occur between undergraduate and graduate-level student writers and community partners who are senior citizens, some of them disabled and dying. We provide three case studies of writers working in a senior learning center, hospice, and a home care setting, examining the productive conflicts that arise in these community sites. By engaging in cross-generational life story projects, student and community participants come to see abstract concepts like rhetorical context and purpose in terms of specific strategies for interacting with diverse others. They learn that writing is inherently a generative, collaborative, and multivocal process, and that we are always accountable to others in creating texts. They find pleasure and meaning in working together, despite and sometimes because of their conflicts. We suggest that composition scholars and teachers re-think their meanings of "community" and "collaboration" and re-consider writing as an act of collaborative risk-taking, experimentation, and imagination. Teaching and learning across the divides of age and ability remind us that writing is, above all, a living social act.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85051849918
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85051849918#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1108/S1572-6304(2012)0000026013
DO - 10.1108/S1572-6304(2012)0000026013
M3 - Chapter
AN - SCOPUS:85051849918
SN - 9781781902653
T3 - Studies in Writing
SP - 205
EP - 226
BT - Service-Learning and Writing
A2 - Baca, Isabel
PB - Brill Academic Publishers
ER -