Abstract
In our joint theoretical piece (Lamb and Peterson 2011), we attempted to find points of agreement and further elucidate points of disagreement in relation to the challenging issue of adolescent girls' sexual empowerment. In particular, we evaluated the divisive question of whether girls' subjective feelings of sexual empowerment qualify as some useful version of empowerment. We are grateful to the commentators for joining us in this productive and collaborative conversation. In this response, we summarize some of the themes raised by the commentators, and we look for points of agreement around which we, as feminists, can continue to build a conversation on this polarizing issue. We also attempt to better explore the possible relationship between subjective empowerment and political empowerment by resurrecting the idea that "the personal is political."
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 758-763 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Sex Roles |
| Volume | 66 |
| Issue number | 11-12 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jun 2012 |
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Gender Studies
- Social Psychology
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
Keywords
- Adolescence
- Empowerment
- Feminism
- Sexuality
- Sexualization
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Political Context for Personal Empowerment: Continuing the Conversation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS