TY - JOUR
T1 - “THOSE OF US WHO STAY”
T2 - SENSEMAKING, EMBODIMENT, AND NAVIGATION OF THE INCLUSION–EXCLUSION PARADOX
AU - Naya, Patricia T.
AU - Contu, Alessia
AU - Poole, Jared
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright of the Academy of Management, all rights reserved. Contents may not be copied, emailed, posted to a listserv, or otherwise transmitted without the copyright holder's express written permission. Users may print, download, or email articles for individual use only.
PY - 2025/1
Y1 - 2025/1
N2 - We examine the inclusion–exclusion paradox in universities navigating societal inequality. Through a grounded theory study of a social justice-oriented university, we theorize how racialized and gendered organizational actors experience an inclusion–exclusion paradox at the individual level as “homecoming–marginalization.” Adopting a power-sensitive perspective, we identify exclusionary mechanisms: blockages in resource flows, penalty of Blackness, and embodied tolls. We introduce “paradox embodiment” to capture how contradictory forces are experienced through the body—with Black and Brown (BB) women bearing direct physical consequences, while White women experience this through empathetic witnessing. Women navigate this paradox through “neutralizing” (supplementary) and “nurturing” (rhizomatic) responses, demonstrating agency. We contribute to paradox theory by advancing debates on emotion and embodiment in paradox, demonstrating that systemic power structures are constitutive of paradox by simultaneously enabling and constraining experiences, and identifying “neutralizing” and “nurturing” responses as new processes of paradox navigation. We offer suggestions for how business schools can navigate inclusion–exclusion tensions toward more equitable management education.
AB - We examine the inclusion–exclusion paradox in universities navigating societal inequality. Through a grounded theory study of a social justice-oriented university, we theorize how racialized and gendered organizational actors experience an inclusion–exclusion paradox at the individual level as “homecoming–marginalization.” Adopting a power-sensitive perspective, we identify exclusionary mechanisms: blockages in resource flows, penalty of Blackness, and embodied tolls. We introduce “paradox embodiment” to capture how contradictory forces are experienced through the body—with Black and Brown (BB) women bearing direct physical consequences, while White women experience this through empathetic witnessing. Women navigate this paradox through “neutralizing” (supplementary) and “nurturing” (rhizomatic) responses, demonstrating agency. We contribute to paradox theory by advancing debates on emotion and embodiment in paradox, demonstrating that systemic power structures are constitutive of paradox by simultaneously enabling and constraining experiences, and identifying “neutralizing” and “nurturing” responses as new processes of paradox navigation. We offer suggestions for how business schools can navigate inclusion–exclusion tensions toward more equitable management education.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105041955209
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105041955209#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.5465/amle.2023.0597
DO - 10.5465/amle.2023.0597
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105041955209
SN - 1537-260X
VL - 24
SP - 373
EP - 396
JO - Academy of Management Learning and Education
JF - Academy of Management Learning and Education
IS - 3
ER -