Abstract
There is a frequent assumption among the general public that contact with Europeans and their material technologies prompted all Native Americans to abandon stone tool technology rather quickly. Archaeologists have done a poor job of changing that misperception, but it would be difficult to dispel a myth that many archaeologists hold as part of their own academic worldview. One does not have to look far to see archaeologists writing about how impressed or awed Native-American people must have been at European technological prowess. The underlying premise is that technological choices are related only to functional efficiency, that our notions of functionality were shared by social actors in the past and that rocks must give way to metal. This paper will reveal how problematic such a premise is when it is assumed rather than tested empirically.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Stone Tool Traditions in the Contact Era |
| Publisher | The University of Alabama Press |
| Pages | 127-150 |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9780817313739 |
| State | Published - 2003 |
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- General Social Sciences
- General Arts and Humanities
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Using a rock in a hard place: Native-American lithic practices in Colonial California'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS