Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Using decision analysis to support proactive management of emerging infectious wildlife diseases

  • Evan H.Campbell Grant
  • , Erin Muths
  • , Rachel A. Katz
  • , Stefano Canessa
  • , Michael J. Adams
  • , Jennifer R. Ballard
  • , Lee Berger
  • , Cheryl J. Briggs
  • , Jeremy T.H. Coleman
  • , Matthew J. Gray
  • , M. Camille Harris
  • , Reid N. Harris
  • , Blake Hossack
  • , Kathryn P. Huyvaert
  • , Jonathan Kolby
  • , Karen R. Lips
  • , Robert E. Lovich
  • , Hamish I. McCallum
  • , Joseph R. Mendelson
  • , Priya Nanjappa
  • Deanna H. Olson, Jenny G. Powers, Katherine L.D. Richgels, Robin E. Russell, Benedikt R. Schmidt, Annemarieke Spitzen-van der Sluijs, Mary Kay Watry, Douglas C. Woodhams, C. Le Ann White
  • United States Geological Survey
  • University of Massachusetts
  • Zoological Society of London Institute of Zoology
  • Wildlife Health Office
  • James Cook University Queensland
  • University of California at Santa Barbara
  • USFWS
  • University of Tennessee, Knoxville
  • James Madison University
  • Colorado State University
  • University of Maryland
  • United States Navy
  • Griffith University Queensland
  • Zoo Atlanta
  • Georgia Institute of Technology
  • ASSOCIATION OF FISH AND WILDLIFE AGENCIES
  • United States Department of Agriculture
  • U.S. Department of the Interior
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • KARCH, Switzerland
  • University of Zurich
  • Reptielen Amfibieën Vissen Onderzoek Nederland
  • Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Despite calls for improved responses to emerging infectious diseases in wildlife, management is seldom considered until a disease has been detected in affected populations. Reactive approaches may limit the potential for control and increase total response costs. An alternative, proactive management framework can identify immediate actions that reduce future impacts even before a disease is detected, and plan subsequent actions that are conditional on disease emergence. We identify four main obstacles to developing proactive management strategies for the newly discovered salamander pathogen Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans (Bsal). Given that uncertainty is a hallmark of wildlife disease management and that associated decisions are often complicated by multiple competing objectives, we advocate using decision analysis to create and evaluate trade-offs between proactive (pre-emergence) and reactive (post-emergence) management options. Policy makers and natural resource agency personnel can apply principles from decision analysis to improve strategies for countering emerging infectious diseases.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)214-221
Number of pages8
JournalFrontiers in Ecology and the Environment
Volume15
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2017

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Using decision analysis to support proactive management of emerging infectious wildlife diseases'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this